🙏 This reporting is free because readers fund it.

More →
December 11, 2025

Lionel E. Giron – Suspended California Attorney

Lionel E. Giron – Suspended California Attorney

Lionel E. Giron, a California attorney admitted to the bar in 1999 and based in Pomona, has faced multiple disciplinary actions throughout his legal career. His record with the State Bar of California includes a significant suspension in 2011 and a recent 2025 suspension with two years of probation, both resulting from criminal convictions that the Bar determined reflected negatively on his fitness to practice law.

2025 Disciplinary Action: One-Year Actual Suspension + Two Years’ Probation

According to the State Bar of California’s public records, Giron’s most recent disciplinary order became effective September 6, 2025. The sanction included:

  • One year of actual suspension from the practice of law

  • Two years of probation

  • Discipline based on misdemeanor criminal convictions involving misconduct and moral turpitude

The State Bar Court’s records show that Giron was involved in multiple criminal matters between 2022 and 2023, which triggered mandatory reporting and ultimately resulted in this formal discipline.
“Moral turpitude” in the context of attorney discipline refers to behavior that calls into question a lawyer’s honesty, integrity, or overall fitness to practice. Because these convictions met that standard, the Bar imposed significant sanctions to protect the public and maintain professional standards.

2011 Discipline: Prior Suspension for Criminal Misconduct

Giron was also disciplined in 2011, when he received an actual suspension tied to earlier criminal convictions. Although the State Bar’s older docket entries are limited online, attorney discipline indexes confirm that:

  • He was suspended in 2011

  • The suspension stemmed from misdemeanor domestic-related convictions

  • He reportedly violated a restraining order, damaged property, and later violated probation by falsely claiming completion of court-ordered community service

This earlier suspension forms part of his ongoing disciplinary history and remains visible in State Bar public records and attorney directories.

Patterns of Misconduct

Across both disciplinary actions, a pattern emerges:

  • Multiple criminal convictions across different periods

  • Findings involving moral turpitude

  • Prior and repeated suspensions rather than disbarment

  • Concerns about compliance with legal obligations, including probation terms and reporting duties

These factors weighed heavily in the Bar’s decision to impose another suspension in 2025.

What Suspension Means for Clients and the Public

During any period of actual suspension, an attorney:

  • Cannot practice law or hold themselves out as eligible to practice

  • Must comply with strict notice requirements to clients, courts, and opposing counsel

  • May only return to practice after meeting State Bar Court conditions

  • Remains under monitoring during probation if reinstated

The California Bar maintains publicly accessible records so that current and prospective clients can review an attorney’s history, ensuring transparency and consumer protection.

Conclusion

Lionel E. Giron is a suspended attorney with a disciplinary history that spans more than a decade. From his 2011 suspension for criminal misconduct to his most recent 2025 one-year suspension and two-year probation, his record reflects ongoing challenges with legal compliance and ethical standards.

While he has not been disbarred, the repeated disciplinary actions underscore the seriousness with which the State Bar treats attorney conduct—especially when it involves criminal convictions and moral turpitude.

Independent Journalism Needs You

You just read something most publications won't touch. We investigate judges who shouldn't be on the bench, attorneys who prey on clients, and a legal system that too often protects itself instead of the public. We do it openly, aggressively, and without apology.

We don't have a paywall. We don't take money from law firms, bar associations, or corporate advertisers who might prefer we stay quiet. Every piece of reporting on this site — every judge exposed, every disbarment documented, every reversal analyzed — was made possible entirely by readers like you.

If you read us regularly — if this work has ever made you angry, informed you, or helped you — we humbly ask you to support us today. It takes less than a minute. Even $1 goes directly toward keeping this reporting alive. Without it, we cannot continue.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.

The Ethics Reporter is independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate backers. Your support is everything.