MINNESOTA, THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT – Former District Court Judge Matthew J. Elken, who served in Minnesota’s Third Judicial District, resigned from the bench in April 2023 amid an ethics investigation by the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards. His departure was a direct result of disciplinary proceedings stemming from a documented pattern of inappropriate conduct, including the misuse of court communication systems and his judicial authority.
Judge Elken ultimately entered into a stipulation for discipline, admitting to or acknowledging the conduct underlying the charges, leading the Minnesota Supreme Court to close the disciplinary file after his resignation formally.
Abusing Court Resources: The Email Misconduct
A central finding in the case involved Judge Elken’s improper use of the official court email system over a period of time. The misconduct was categorized as a severe violation of judicial standards requiring judges to maintain decorum and respect the judicial resources entrusted to them.
The key aspects of this violation included:
-
Inappropriate Content: Judge Elken sent numerous emails containing sexually suggestive humor to multiple court employees, including managers, clerks, and administrators.
-
Partisan Content: He also circulated emails containing politically partisan content using the official court system.
-
Scope: These communications were found to be offensive and constituted an abuse of both official time and court resources, contributing to a lack of professionalism in the workplace.
Misuse of Judicial Authority
Beyond the communications, Judge Elken was disciplined for improperly injecting himself into an active criminal matter, violating the fundamental rule against ex parte communications.
-
Improper Intervention: He improperly intervened in a criminal case involving a defendant who had previously appeared before him.
-
Forbidden Contact: He contacted the defendant’s defense attorney and offered an opinion or advice on how the case should proceed.
-
Ethical Violation: This action represented an attempt to improperly influence the handling of a case, constituting a clear misuse of his judicial authority.
Conclusion: Resignation as a Consequence
The Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards concluded that Judge Elken’s conduct was “inconsistent with the standards required of a judge.” The repeated and improper use of official resources for personal, inappropriate, and partisan communications, combined with his interference in a pending criminal case, demonstrated a profound failure to adhere to the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct.
His resignation, timed during the disciplinary proceedings, served as the ultimate sanction for misconduct that severely compromised the integrity and professional atmosphere of the court. The case underscores the principle that judges must uphold the highest standards of dignity and professionalism, not only in the courtroom but also in their communications with staff.