On May 21, 2024 — fourteen months after Litigation Practice Group filed for bankruptcy with $4,500 in its accounts and left approximately 60,000 debt-relief clients without representation — a domain name was registered: everestlawpc.com.

The timing alone does not prove anything. Plenty of legitimate businesses are founded in the aftermath of industry collapses, sometimes by the very people who understand those industries best. But in the case of Everest Law PC, the timing is not the only thing that raises questions. It is the entire architecture of the firm — the deliberate anonymity, the structural parallels to the LPG playbook, and the specific allegations of a confidential source — that demands serious scrutiny.

What The Public Record Shows

Everest Law PC operates at everestlawpc.com, a Squarespace-hosted website. The domain was registered on May 21, 2024, through Squarespace Domains LLC. The registrant's name is redacted under a privacy protection service. The website lists a physical address of 7533 S Center View Ct, West Jordan, Utah — a suburban address that Yelp confirms as the firm's registered location.

The firm's Squarespace site metadata shows the registered jurisdiction as Florida — not Utah. It claims the firm has been "Serving Clients For 7+ Years" and has achieved "$200M+ In Debt Dismissed, Reduced, or Resolved." Both claims are difficult to square with a domain registered less than a year ago. A firm that has served clients for seven-plus years and resolved over $200 million in debt would have a far more substantial public footprint than a recently registered Squarespace domain with no named attorneys.

The Everest Law PC website lists a toll-free phone number — (800) 738-5009 — but names no attorneys anywhere on the site. The "About" page describes the firm's mission without identifying a single human being associated with it. The firm's Instagram account is @everestlawgroup. There is no bar number, no managing partner bio, no attorney profiles of any kind. For a professional corporation — a PC or PLLC — whose entire legal authority to practice law rests on the bar licenses of its attorney-owners, this absence is not merely unusual. It is a structural anomaly that invites immediate regulatory concern.

The Utah PLLC Question

A confidential source with personal knowledge of Everest Law PC's operations has informed The Ethics Reporter that the entity is organized as a Utah Professional Limited Liability Company — a PLLC — but that it may have been administratively dissolved by the Utah Division of Corporations. The Ethics Reporter attempted to independently verify the entity's current registration status through the Utah Division of Corporations' online business entity search system. The system's interactive search interface was not accessible via automated query at the time of our research, and we were unable to confirm or deny the entity's active status through the public portal.

Administrative dissolution in Utah occurs when a business entity fails to file its required annual reports, pay its fees, or otherwise comply with state maintenance requirements. Critically: an administratively dissolved PLLC loses its legal authority to conduct business in Utah. If Everest Law PC's entity status has lapsed while it continues to solicit clients, collect fees, and hold itself out as a practicing law firm, that would constitute the operation of an unauthorized business — and potentially the unauthorized practice of law — in Utah and any other state where its attorneys practice.

The Ethics Reporter is continuing to pursue verification of the entity's current status and will update this article as additional documentation becomes available. We are urging the Utah Division of Corporations, the Utah State Bar, and the bar associations of any state in which Everest Law PC claims to have licensed attorneys to investigate this question immediately.

The Structural DNA: An LPG Echo Chamber

For anyone who has studied the LPG playbook, the Everest Law PC business model as described on its website is deeply familiar. The firm offers:

• Debt defense and consumer protection services — identical to LPG's core practice
• Flat-rate legal packages — structured fee arrangements similar to LPG's monthly ACH billing model
• "White-labeled legal support" for "national business partners" — a term that describes precisely the affiliate network model through which LPG scaled its client intake via 100 marketing affiliates across the country
• "Self-Help & Membership" subscription tiers — a recurring revenue stream that, like LPG's ACH debits, creates a predictable flow of consumer payments
• Nationwide claims to be "Licensed In 50 States" — an extraordinary claim for a firm with no named attorneys and a physical presence at a suburban West Jordan, Utah address

The white-label offering is particularly worth examining. Everest Law PC's attorney-representation page explicitly markets the firm's legal services to "national business partners" — entities that would send their clients to Everest for legal work in exchange for a fee arrangement. This is precisely how LPG's affiliate network operated: third-party marketing companies would generate clients and transfer them to LPG, which would handle the legal work and collect the ongoing fees. When LPG's trustee alleged that Diab created "alter ego" firms to receive LPG's client accounts after the bankruptcy, those alter ego firms would need exactly this kind of white-label intake capability.

No Lawyers Named. Alias-Only Communications.

The confidential source told The Ethics Reporter that Everest Law PC communicates with clients and prospective hires exclusively through email aliases — meaning that no human name is attached to any written communication from the firm. Clients cannot identify who they are communicating with. Attorneys who work with the firm cannot identify its true principals through normal channels.

This is not merely an unusual business practice. In the context of Tony Diab's documented history, alias-only communications are a direct parallel to his documented behavior at LPG: requiring employees to call him "Admin," keeping a desk nameplate that said "I don't work here," and signing contracts under Daniel March's name using DocuSign. The operational goal in each case is identical — to prevent the creation of any documentary trail that would identify the true controlling person of the enterprise.

For a person who is both disbarred and reportedly cooperating with a federal bankruptcy trustee in a proceeding that alleged he transferred LPG's clients to secretly controlled successor firms, the use of alias-only communications at a new debt-relief firm is not a coincidence. It is a method.

Attorneys Not Being Paid

The confidential source also told The Ethics Reporter that Everest Law PC has not been paying its attorneys — and that the managing partner of record is no longer actually working there. If accurate, this allegation mirrors the structural failure pattern of LPG in its terminal phase: a law firm that collects fees from clients while failing to compensate the attorneys who are supposed to be performing the legal work.

This matters for clients because unpaid attorneys don't perform legal work. If an attorney is not being compensated, they are not reviewing cases, filing motions, appearing in court, or providing any of the services for which the client's fees are ostensibly being collected. The client's money flows in. The legal work does not flow out. The result is a structural replication of exactly the harm LPG's clients suffered — fees paid, debts unresolved, attorneys unavailable.

It also matters from a regulatory standpoint. An attorney who is not paid but whose bar license is being used to authorize a firm's legal practice — without the attorney's active participation — is in precisely the position that Daniel March occupied at LPG. The attorney's license becomes the legal fiction behind which someone else operates.

The Claim: "$200M+ In Debt Resolved" by a Firm Less Than a Year Old

One detail on the Everest Law PC website deserves direct scrutiny. The firm claims to have resolved "$200M+ In Debt Dismissed, Reduced, or Resolved" — an impressive figure. It also claims "7+ Years Serving Clients."

The domain everestlawpc.com was registered on May 21, 2024. As of April 2026, the firm has been in existence for approximately eleven months under that domain. A firm cannot have seven-plus years of client service history with an eleven-month-old website. Either the firm is claiming credit for work performed under a different entity name — which raises its own questions about what entity that was — or the statistics are fabricated.

If the "$200M+ in debt resolved" figure represents work done under LPG's umbrella — before the bankruptcy, before the trustee's appointment, before the alleged fraud became public — then Everest Law PC is marketing itself on the back of Litigation Practice Group's track record. That would be an extraordinary ethical violation: a successor enterprise built on the reputation of a bankrupt, fraudulent predecessor, marketing that reputation to new clients without disclosure.

What We Are Asking Regulators to Do

The Ethics Reporter is formally calling on the following institutions to investigate Everest Law PC immediately:

The Utah Division of Corporations should confirm the entity's current registration status. If Everest Law PC has been administratively dissolved, it should publicly confirm that the entity lacks legal authority to conduct business and refer the matter to the Utah State Bar and Attorney General.

The Utah State Bar should investigate whether any Utah-licensed attorney is the managing partner of Everest Law PC; whether that attorney is actively practicing; whether client funds are being properly maintained in trust; and whether any disbarred individual is exercising control over the firm's operations.

The California State Bar — which is already familiar with Tony Diab's history — should assess whether the allegations regarding Everest Law PC constitute a violation of the terms of Diab's cooperation with Trustee Marshack, or whether the firm represents a new iteration of the unauthorized practice scheme for which Diab was twice disbarred.

The Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California should consider whether Everest Law PC's operations — if connected to Tony Diab — constitute a violation of his obligations as a cooperating witness in the LPG bankruptcy proceeding.

The clients who are currently paying Everest Law PC monthly fees deserve to know who is actually running the firm they are trusting with their financial futures. So do the attorneys whose bar licenses may be providing the legal cover for someone else's enterprise.

We are watching. And we are asking you to watch with us.

This is Part 5 of The Ethics Reporter's investigative series: "The Ghost in the Law Firm: The Tony Diab Story." Read Part 4 here. The Ethics Reporter will continue to monitor and report on Everest Law PC. If you have documentation, employment records, communications, or other information about this firm, contact us at theethicsreporter.com.