Broker PFOF Analysis

Citadel Securities and E*Trade: The PFOF Relationship Explained

E*Trade Financial (now Morgan Stanley) routes a significant portion of its customers' stock orders to Citadel Securities through payment for order flow arrangements. Here is what this means for E*Trade customers.

The E*Trade-Citadel PFOF Relationship

E*Trade was one of the original discount brokers to adopt PFOF arrangements with Citadel Securities. Following Morgan Stanley's acquisition of E*Trade in 2020, the combined entity continued significant PFOF arrangements. Morgan Stanley's wealth management and institutional businesses create additional potential conflicts with retail order routing.

The Financial Scale

In 2019-2020, E*Trade received hundreds of millions in payment for order flow. This payment came primarily from Citadel Securities in exchange for routing E*Trade customers' equity orders to Citadel for execution. Citadel paid this amount because it expected to extract significantly more value from executing E*Trade's customers' orders — through spread capture — than it paid for the order flow. The difference represents value extracted from E*Trade customers through execution quality degradation.

Regulatory Actions

No specific PFOF enforcement action. Acquired by Morgan Stanley 2020.

What E*Trade Customers Should Know

E*Trade customers can find out how their orders are routed by accessing the broker's SEC Rule 606 quarterly report, typically available in the "Legal Disclosures" or "About" section of the broker's website. For investors concerned about PFOF, alternative brokers that route to exchanges directly — including Fidelity (for equity orders) and Interactive Brokers (with direct routing option) — are available.

Support Independent Accountability Journalism

The Ethics Reporter is the only independent news organization systematically tracking how Kenneth Griffin's political spending relates to the regulatory environment that protects Citadel Securities' business model. This reporting serves retail investors across every state in the country.

We are reader-funded and accept no money from financial industry advertisers. If this reporting is valuable — if you believe retail investors deserve transparency about who controls their trades — please support us.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.