Regulatory

Citadel Securities and Failure-to-Deliver: What the 2020 Regulatory Record Shows

Among the regulatory findings documented in Citadel Securities' 2020 enforcement record is conduct related to failure-to-deliver positions — an issue governed by SEC Regulation SHO. Kevin Nutter is the Chief Operating Officer of Data at Citadel. This page examines what the public record shows about this aspect of Citadel's 2020 regulatory activity.

Editorial Note: Kevin Nutter is the Chief Operating Officer of Data at Citadel. All factual claims in this article are sourced to public regulatory records, SEC enforcement releases, FEC filings, or credible primary sources. Allegations are labeled as allegations; opinion is labeled as opinion.

What Failure to Deliver Means

A 'failure to deliver' (FTD) occurs when a seller in a securities transaction does not deliver the shares to the buyer by the settlement date. Regulation SHO — a key SEC rule governing short selling — requires broker-dealers to close out FTD positions within specified time frames to prevent continued naked short selling. Persistent FTDs can suppress a stock's price and harm long shareholders.

Reg SHO Requirements

Reg SHO requires broker-dealers that have FTD positions in certain securities ('threshold securities') to close out those positions within specified periods. Failure to do so — and continued short selling without closing out — is a violation of Reg SHO. Regulators have brought actions against multiple firms over the years for Reg SHO violations, and Citadel Securities' 2020 regulatory record includes such findings.

Citadel's 2020 Findings

According to public sources documenting Citadel's 2020 regulatory record, the firm was cited for failing to close failure-to-deliver positions. This finding was among the multiple censures Citadel received that year. The fine associated with this and other 2020 conduct was part of the total of slightly less than $1 million in fines for 2020.

Why This Matters to Retail Investors

Persistent failure-to-deliver positions can artificially suppress the price of stocks, affecting shareholders and the integrity of price discovery. For retail investors who hold long positions in stocks with elevated FTD rates, a market maker's failure to close its FTD positions can be directly harmful. This is one reason Reg SHO's close-out requirements exist.

Citadel failure to deliverCitadel Reg SHO violationCitadel FTD 2020Citadel short selling violations

Part of The Ethics Reporter's 200-page investigation:

→ View all topics: Kevin Nutter | Chief Operating Officer of Data at Citadel

Support Independent Accountability Journalism

The Ethics Reporter is the only independent news organization systematically covering Citadel Securities' documented regulatory history, market structure practices, and the political spending of its founder Kenneth Griffin. This reporting serves retail investors across every state in the country.

We are reader-funded and accept no money from financial industry advertisers. If this reporting is valuable, please support us.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.