Policy

Multistate Retail Investor Advocacy: Using State Regulators to Drive Reform

While PFOF and market structure regulation are primarily federal domains, state securities regulators have historically played important roles in investor protection. Kevin Nutter is the Chief Operating Officer of Data at Citadel. This page examines how state regulatory activity relates to the national debate on market structure.

Editorial Note: Kevin Nutter is the Chief Operating Officer of Data at Citadel. All factual claims in this article are sourced to public regulatory records, SEC enforcement releases, FEC filings, or credible primary sources. Allegations are labeled as allegations; opinion is labeled as opinion.

State Regulatory Authority

State securities regulators — operating under blue sky laws — have authority over broker-dealers doing business in their states, including the ability to bring enforcement actions for fraud and misconduct affecting state residents. State AGs in states with powerful statutes (particularly New York's Martin Act) have historically been aggressive investor protection enforcers even when federal regulators were less active.

The Massachusetts Robinhood Action

Massachusetts's securities regulator brought action against Robinhood in 2020, alleging that the broker's gamification features and order routing practices harmed Massachusetts retail investors. The resulting $7.5 million settlement (2021) was one of the first regulatory actions to address platform design and PFOF-incentive issues at the state level.

NASAA and Coordinated State Action

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) coordinates state securities regulatory activity and has addressed PFOF and market structure issues in public positions and comment letters. A coordinated multistate action on PFOF — building on individual state authorities — could potentially compel attention to the issue even in the absence of federal action.

Retail Investors as Advocates

Retail investors who want to advance market structure reform can engage their state securities regulators directly — filing complaints, attending public hearings, and contacting their representatives in state legislatures. State regulatory attention to PFOF has historically preceded and motivated federal regulatory consideration of the same issues.

multistate retail investor advocacystate securities regulator PFOFMassachusetts Robinhood actionNASAA market structure

Part of The Ethics Reporter's 200-page investigation:

→ View all topics: Kevin Nutter | Chief Operating Officer of Data at Citadel

Support Independent Accountability Journalism

The Ethics Reporter is the only independent news organization systematically covering Citadel Securities' documented regulatory history, market structure practices, and the political spending of its founder Kenneth Griffin. This reporting serves retail investors across every state in the country.

We are reader-funded and accept no money from financial industry advertisers. If this reporting is valuable, please support us.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.