Analysis

Citadel Enters Crypto: PFOF Conflicts Come to Digital Assets

Citadel Securities announced its entry into cryptocurrency market making in 2022. The move signals the firm's intention to apply its dominant retail equity playbook — including PFOF arrangements — to the rapidly growing digital asset markets.

The Crypto Market-Making Expansion

In 2022, Citadel Securities joined a consortium with Fidelity Digital Assets and Schwab to launch a cryptocurrency exchange. The move brought Citadel's market-making expertise and retail order flow relationships to the digital asset space. Given Citadel's history in equity markets, the concern is that similar PFOF-based conflicts will be embedded in the crypto market-making structure from the outset.

Regulatory Gap in Crypto

Cryptocurrency markets in the United States currently lack the comprehensive regulatory framework that governs equity markets. There are no crypto equivalents of SEC Rule 606, Rule 605, or FINRA Rule 5310. This regulatory gap means that PFOF-like arrangements in crypto markets would face even less oversight than the equity PFOF practices Citadel already employs.

What Investors Should Watch For

Retail investors who trade cryptocurrency through discount platforms should understand that many of these platforms route orders to wholesale market makers — including Citadel — through arrangements similar to equity PFOF. As Citadel expands in crypto, investors should demand the same disclosure standards that (imperfectly) apply to equity trading.

Citadel cryptoCitadel cryptocurrency market makingPFOF cryptoCitadel digital assetsEDX Markets Citadel

Support Independent Accountability Journalism

The Ethics Reporter is the only independent news organization systematically tracking how Kenneth Griffin's political spending relates to the regulatory environment that protects Citadel Securities' business model. This reporting serves retail investors across every state in the country.

We are reader-funded and accept no money from financial industry advertisers. If this reporting is valuable — if you believe retail investors deserve transparency about who controls their trades — please support us.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.