Analysis

Citadel Securities in Options Markets: PFOF Conflicts in Derivatives Trading

While most public attention has focused on Citadel Securities' equity market-making operations, the firm is equally dominant in options markets. Options PFOF arrangements are less regulated, less studied, and potentially more harmful to retail investors than equity PFOF — because options involve more complex pricing and greater information asymmetry between market makers and retail traders.

Options PFOF: Less Regulated, More Complex

In options markets, payment for order flow arrangements allow market makers like Citadel to pay for retail options orders — and then execute them at prices that capture the bid-ask spread in the options market. Options spreads are typically much wider than equity spreads, meaning the extraction of value from retail options traders is proportionately larger per dollar traded.

The Retail Options Trading Boom

The post-2020 explosion in retail options trading — driven by Robinhood and similar platforms — has significantly increased the size of the retail options order flow that flows to Citadel. Millions of retail investors who have never understood options are placing options trades that are immediately routed to Citadel Securities for execution at spreads that benefit the market maker.

Regulatory Response to Options PFOF

The SEC and FINRA have applied the same disclosure-based approach to options PFOF as to equity PFOF. This approach is inadequate for options markets where pricing complexity makes execution quality comparisons nearly impossible for retail investors.

Citadel options market makingoptions PFOFretail options trading Citadeloptions market maker conflictPFOF options

Support Independent Accountability Journalism

The Ethics Reporter is the only independent news organization systematically tracking how Kenneth Griffin's political spending relates to the regulatory environment that protects Citadel Securities' business model. This reporting serves retail investors across every state in the country.

We are reader-funded and accept no money from financial industry advertisers. If this reporting is valuable — if you believe retail investors deserve transparency about who controls their trades — please support us.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.