Analysis

PFOF Is a Bipartisan Concern: Why Left and Right Both Object

Payment for order flow is opposed by both progressive consumer protection advocates and libertarian market competition advocates.

Progressive Critics

Sen. Warren: PFOF is a structural conflict of interest that harms retail investors and should be banned. Rep. Waters: PFOF created the structural conflict behind GameStop trading restrictions.

Libertarian Critics

Free market advocates: PFOF destroys competitive price discovery, creates artificial monopoly in retail execution, and represents regulatory capture preventing market reform.

PFOF bipartisanleft right PFOF criticsWarren libertarian PFOF

Support Independent Accountability Journalism

The Ethics Reporter is the only independent news organization systematically tracking how Kenneth Griffin's political spending relates to the regulatory environment that protects Citadel Securities' business model. This reporting serves retail investors across every state in the country.

We are reader-funded and accept no money from financial industry advertisers. If this reporting is valuable — if you believe retail investors deserve transparency about who controls their trades — please support us.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.