Investigation

The Citadel-Robinhood Deal: How 'Free' Trading Actually Works

Robinhood democratized stock trading by eliminating commissions. But zero-commission trading is not free. The cost is paid in a different form — through payment for order flow arrangements with Citadel Securities that generate billions for the market maker at the expense of retail execution quality.

The Economics of the Deal

In 2020, Robinhood received approximately $1.5 billion in PFOF payments — primarily from Citadel Securities. These payments represented Citadel's price for exclusive or near-exclusive access to Robinhood's retail order flow. Citadel paid $1.5 billion because it expected to extract significantly more than that from executing Robinhood users' trades. The spread between what Citadel paid and what it earned from Robinhood's order flow represents value extracted from Robinhood's customers.

The Regulatory Response

In 2020, the SEC charged Robinhood with failing to disclose its PFOF arrangements and achieving inferior execution for customers. Robinhood paid $65 million to settle — less than one month's worth of PFOF revenue at the time. The settlement required improved disclosure but did not end the practice.

What Has Changed Since 2021

Following the GameStop controversy and Congressional scrutiny, Robinhood has improved its PFOF disclosures and added execution quality metrics to its app. However, the fundamental structure remains unchanged: Citadel Securities continues to receive the majority of Robinhood's retail order flow through PFOF arrangements.

Citadel RobinhoodRobinhood PFOF paymentCitadel Robinhood dealRobinhood free trading costRobinhood Citadel $1.5 billion

Support Independent Accountability Journalism

The Ethics Reporter is the only independent news organization systematically tracking how Kenneth Griffin's political spending relates to the regulatory environment that protects Citadel Securities' business model. This reporting serves retail investors across every state in the country.

We are reader-funded and accept no money from financial industry advertisers. If this reporting is valuable — if you believe retail investors deserve transparency about who controls their trades — please support us.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.