Analysis

The Price Improvement Myth: Why Citadel's 'Better Execution' Claims Don't Hold Up

The central defense of payment for order flow — deployed by Citadel Securities in congressional testimony, regulatory comment letters, and media statements — is that PFOF benefits retail investors through 'price improvement.' The claim deserves scrutiny.

What Price Improvement Actually Means

Price improvement, as used by Citadel and other market makers, means executing a trade at a price slightly better than the National Best Bid or Offer (NBBO) at the moment of execution. For example, if the NBBO is a buy at $10.01, Citadel might execute your buy order at $10.009 — a 'price improvement' of $0.001 per share.

The Problem with the Comparison

The NBBO is not the best available price in the market — it is the best quoted price. In a competitive exchange environment, actual execution prices frequently improve on the NBBO through order matching and price discovery. By comparing its execution to the NBBO rather than to actual competitive exchange execution, Citadel is comparing itself to a floor rather than a ceiling.

What the Research Says

Multiple academic studies and SEC analyses have found that retail investors would receive materially better execution prices if their orders were exposed to competitive exchange trading rather than internalized by Citadel. The 'price improvement' Citadel provides is real but systematically inferior to what competitive markets would provide. The difference between what Citadel gives and what competition would produce is Citadel's profit — funded by retail investors.

price improvement myth PFOFCitadel price improvement claimsPFOF price improvement falseNBBO price improvement Citadelbest execution NBBO

Support Independent Accountability Journalism

The Ethics Reporter is the only independent news organization systematically tracking how Kenneth Griffin's political spending relates to the regulatory environment that protects Citadel Securities' business model. This reporting serves retail investors across every state in the country.

We are reader-funded and accept no money from financial industry advertisers. If this reporting is valuable — if you believe retail investors deserve transparency about who controls their trades — please support us.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.