August 21, 2025

Florida Supreme Court Disbars Attorney Pamela Therese Calderon for Misappropriating Client Funds

Florida Supreme Court Disbars Attorney Pamela Therese Calderon for Misappropriating Client Funds

The legal profession places trust and fiduciary responsibility at its core. Attorneys who manage client funds must handle them with the utmost care, as even minor lapses can erode public confidence in the justice system. The recent disciplinary case of Pamela Therese Calderon, a Florida attorney admitted to practice in 1991, illustrates the devastating consequences that can result when these duties are breached. In May 2025, the Florida Supreme Court approved her petition for disciplinary revocation, the functional equivalent of permanent disbarment, after finding she misappropriated nearly $50,000 in client funds.

The Florida Bar v. Calderon, SC2024-1416 (Fla. Nov. 12, 2024).

Florida Supreme Court Disciplinary Order (May 8, 2025).

The Florida Supreme Court has permanently disbarred attorney Pamela Therese Calderon, effective May 8, 2025, after finding she misappropriated nearly $50,000 in client funds.

Calderon, admitted to practice in 1991, mishandled a $75,000 wire transfer she received in a marital dissolution case. Instead of following client instructions to disburse the funds to designated parties, she made unauthorized payments and by July 2024, her trust account balance had dropped to just $397.43, leaving her client owed more than $47,000.

The Florida Bar filed for an emergency suspension, which the Court granted on November 12, 2024 (The Florida Bar v. Calderon, SC2024-1416). Calderon then petitioned for disciplinary revocation without leave to reapply, effectively making the sanction permanent disbarment.

Under the Court’s order, she must repay Bar costs, cooperate with a trust account audit, and reimburse any payouts from the Client Security Fund.

Pamela Therese Calderon is now permanently barred from practicing law in Florida. She may not provide legal services, hold herself out as an attorney, or seek reinstatement in the future.

The Calderon case underscores the Florida Supreme Court’s firm stance: misappropriation of client funds is one of the gravest ethical violations and warrants permanent removal from the profession.

Conclusion

The disbarment of Pamela Therese Calderon serves as a stark warning: attorneys must guard client funds with absolute integrity. Calderon’s misuse of nearly $50,000 in entrusted money not only ended her decades-long career but also reinforced the Florida Supreme Court’s consistent stance that misappropriation of client funds warrants the harshest sanction permanent removal from the legal profession.

Want more legal ethics breakdown like this?
Subscribe to our blog or follow us for weekly case summaries, rules analyses, and disciplinary updates.

Independent Journalism Needs You

You just read something most publications won't touch. We investigate judges who shouldn't be on the bench, attorneys who prey on clients, and a legal system that too often protects itself instead of the public. We do it openly, aggressively, and without apology.

We don't have a paywall. We don't take money from law firms, bar associations, or corporate advertisers who might prefer we stay quiet. Every piece of reporting on this site — every judge exposed, every disbarment documented, every reversal analyzed — was made possible entirely by readers like you.

If you read us regularly — if this work has ever made you angry, informed you, or helped you — we humbly ask you to support us today. It takes less than a minute. Even $1 goes directly toward keeping this reporting alive. Without it, we cannot continue.

Reader Supported

This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.

We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.

Join 47 readers who donated this month

47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters

Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.

The Ethics Reporter is independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate backers. Your support is everything.