Suspension Amid Conviction: The Case of Attorney Taylor Wayne Casey
Maintaining public trust demands that attorneys uphold both legal and ethical standards both inside and outside the courtroom. The recent case involving Taylor Wayne Casey, a Jacksonville-based lawyer, underscores how serious criminal convictions can trigger automatic disciplinary actions and jeopardize one’s legal career.
The Florida Bar v. Casey, SC2025-0596 (Fla. May 7, 2025) Notice of Judgment of Guilt and interim felony suspension.
Taylor Wayne Casey, admitted to the Florida Bar in 2011, was convicted on May 31, 2024 following a jury trial. His offenses included:
•Resisting an officer with violence (third-degree felony),
He was arrested on December 4, 2023, and formally charged on December 22, 2023. His sentencing on January 17, 2025, included 18 months probation for the felony and unsupervised probation for the misdemeanors.
On May 7, 2025, the Florida Supreme Court issued a Notice of Judgment of Guilt, prompting an interim felony suspension, effective 30 days later. This allowed Casey time to wrap up current cases and safeguard client interests.
As part of the suspension:
•Casey must cease accepting new clients.
•He must notify clients, opposing counsel, and relevant courts of the suspension.
•He must submit affidavits listing those notified.
Additionally, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued an order on May 9, 2025, formally suspending Casey from practicing in federal court, striking him from the bar roll, and revoking his CM/ECF access.
As it stands, Taylor Wayne Casey is under an interim felony suspension by both the Florida Supreme Court and the Southern District of Florida. The suspension will go into effect 30 days after the May 7, 2025 order unless Casey notifies otherwise.
Further disciplinary proceedings are likely to follow, including a referee hearing and potential final sanctions depending on the findings and any mitigating factors.
Criminal conduct off the bench matters. Even actions outside the courtroom can threaten a lawyer’s ability to practice, especially when they involve violence or dishonesty.
Conclusion
Taylor Wayne Casey’s convictions and ensuing interim felony suspension highlight the legal profession’s zero tolerance approach to criminal behavior by attorneys. His continued practice depends on the outcome of upcoming disciplinary proceedings and his ability to demonstrate rehabilitation and compliance with ethical standards.
Want more legal ethics breakdown like this?
Subscribe to our blog or follow us for daily case summaries, rule analyses, and disciplinary updates
Independent Journalism Needs You
You just read something most publications won't touch. We investigate judges who shouldn't be on the bench, attorneys who prey on clients, and a legal system that too often protects itself instead of the public. We do it openly, aggressively, and without apology.
We don't have a paywall. We don't take money from law firms, bar associations, or corporate advertisers who might prefer we stay quiet. Every piece of reporting on this site — every judge exposed, every disbarment documented, every reversal analyzed — was made possible entirely by readers like you.
If you read us regularly — if this work has ever made you angry, informed you, or helped you — we humbly ask you to support us today. It takes less than a minute. Even $1 goes directly toward keeping this reporting alive. Without it, we cannot continue.
Reader Supported
This journalism is free because readers like you make it possible.
We don't have corporate advertisers. We don't take money from law firms. Every investigation you read here is funded entirely by readers. Even $1 keeps us going.
Join 47 readers who donated this month
47% toward our monthly goal of 100 supporters
Secure checkout via Stripe. Cancel your monthly gift anytime.
The Ethics Reporter is independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate backers. Your support is everything.